[PATCH] D105127: Implement P1401R5

[Richard Smith - zygoloid via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

rsmith added a comment.

Would we benefit from any more test coverage for the `static_assert` side of this paper, or is our (formerly wrong and now correct) behavior already well-covered by existing tests? (Similarly for `explicit(bool)`, do we already have good test coverage for the distinction between "contextually converted constant expression of type `bool`" and the various other possible rules?)


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D105127/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D105127