[PATCH] D104222: [clang-format] [PR50702] Lamdba processing does not respect AfterClass and AfterNamespace

[MyDeveloperDay via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

MyDeveloperDay added a comment.



> And also another different in that case (without lambda):
>
>   	ASSERT_NO_THROW(
>   		{
>   			iterator += 507408;
>   		});
>
> is now format like this:
>
>   	ASSERT_NO_THROW({ iterator += 507408; });

I think this shows where your change made an assumption that this was a lambda, but its not necessarily is as there is no TT_LamdbaLBrace, I would argue your change was the regression even if looks nicer (in your view)

AnnotatedTokens(L=0):
 M=0 C=0 T=Unknown S=1 F=0 B=0 BK=0 P=0 Name=identifier L=15 PPK=2 FakeLParens= FakeRParens=0 II=0xad8a50 Text='ASSERT_NO_THROW'
 M=0 C=0 T=Unknown S=0 F=0 B=1 BK=0 P=23 Name=l_paren L=16 PPK=2 FakeLParens= FakeRParens=0 II=0x0 Text='('
 M=0 C=1 T=Unknown S=0 F=0 B=0 BK=1 P=140 Name=l_brace L=17 PPK=2 FakeLParens= FakeRParens=0 II=0x0 Text='{'
 M=0 C=1 T=Unknown S=1 F=0 B=0 BK=0 P=61 Name=r_brace L=39 PPK=2 FakeLParens= FakeRParens=0 II=0x0 Text='}'
 M=0 C=0 T=Unknown S=0 F=0 B=0 BK=0 P=43 Name=r_paren L=40 PPK=2 FakeLParens= FakeRParens=0 II=0x0 Text=')'
 M=0 C=0 T=Unknown S=0 F=0 B=0 BK=0 P=23 Name=semi L=41 PPK=2 FakeLParens= FakeRParens=0 II=0x0 Text=';'


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D104222/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D104222