[PATCH] D104222: [clang-format] [PR50702] Lamdba processing does not respect AfterClass and AfterNamespace
Francois JEAN via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jun 15 12:37:03 PDT 2021
Wawha added a comment.
Indeed, I found another case with a regression:
return iter::chain.from_iterable(
[](auto&& ite) -> auto&
{
return ite.second;
});
it's format all inline.
And also another different in that case (without lambda):
ASSERT_NO_THROW(
{
iterator += 507408;
});
is now format like this:
ASSERT_NO_THROW({ iterator += 507408; });
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104222/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104222
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list