[PATCH] D104136: [analyzer] Add better tracking for RetainCountChecker leak warnings
Artem Dergachev via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jun 11 11:55:32 PDT 2021
NoQ added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/RetainCountChecker/RetainCountDiagnostics.cpp:953-957
+ // Let's traverse...
+ for (const ExplodedNode *N = ExprNode;
+ // ...all the nodes corresponding to the given expression...
+ N != nullptr && N->getStmtForDiagnostics() == E;
+ N = N->getFirstPred()) {
----------------
I guess this part should ultimately be written in one place, eg. `ExplodedNode::findTag()` or something like that.
I'd also really like to explore the possibility to further limit the variety of nodes traversed here. What nodes are typically traversed here? Is it checker-tagged nodes or is it purge dead symbol nodes or something else?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104136/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D104136
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list