[PATCH] D103611: Correct the behavior of va_arg checking in C++
Eli Friedman via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Jun 7 11:26:49 PDT 2021
efriedma added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp:15783
+ // test for typesAreCompatible() will already properly consider those to
+ // be compatible types.
+ if (Context.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus && !PromoteType.isNull() &&
----------------
This explanation doesn't seem right. Signed and unsigned types are never considered "compatible".
If I'm understanding correctly, the case this code addresses is promotion according to `[conv.prom]`p3: "A prvalue of an unscoped enumeration type whose underlying type is not fixed [...]". Somehow, the enum ends up with an unsigned underlying type, but we promote to int? And this doesn't happen in C somehow?
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D103611/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D103611
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list