[PATCH] D103579: [LTO] Fix -fwhole-program-vtables handling after HIP ThinLTO patch
Teresa Johnson via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jun 2 17:33:35 PDT 2021
tejohnson created this revision.
tejohnson added reviewers: yaxunl, tra.
Herald added a subscriber: inglorion.
tejohnson requested review of this revision.
Herald added a project: clang.
Herald added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
A recent change (D99683 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D99683>) to support ThinLTO for HIP caused a regression
when compiling cuda code with -flto=thin -fwhole-program-vtables.
Specifically, we now get an error:
error: invalid argument '-fwhole-program-vtables' only allowed with '-flto'
This error is coming from the device offload cc1 action being set up for
the cuda compile, for which -flto=thin doesn't apply and gets dropped.
This is a regression, but points to a potential issue that was silently
occurring before the patch, details below.
Before D99683 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D99683>, the check for fwhole-program-vtables in the driver looked
like:
if (WholeProgramVTables) {
if (!D.isUsingLTO())
D.Diag(diag::err_drv_argument_only_allowed_with)
<< "-fwhole-program-vtables"
<< "-flto";
CmdArgs.push_back("-fwhole-program-vtables");
}
And D.isUsingLTO() returned true since we have -flto=thin. However,
because the cuda cc1 compile is doing device offloading, which didn't
support any LTO, there was other code that suppressed -flto* options
from being passed to the cc1 invocation. So the cc1 invocation silently
had -fwhole-program-vtables without any -flto*. This seems potentially
problematic, since if we had any virtual calls we would get type test
assume sequences without the corresponding LTO pass that handles them.
However, with the patch, which adds support for device offloading LTO
option -foffload-lto=thin, the code has changed so that we set a bool
IsUsingLTO based on either -flto* or -foffload-lto*, depending on
whether this is the device offloading action. For the device offload
action in our compile, since we don't have -foffload-lto, IsUsingLTO is
false, and the check for LTO with -fwhole-program-vtables now fails.
What we should do is only pass through -fwhole-program-vtables to the
cc1 invocation that has LTO enabled (either the device offload action
with -foffload-lto, or the non-device offload action with -flto), and
otherwise drop the -fwhole-program-vtables for the non-LTO action.
Then we should error only if we have -fwhole-program-vtables without any
-f*lto* options.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
https://reviews.llvm.org/D103579
Files:
clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp
clang/test/Driver/hip-options.hip
Index: clang/test/Driver/hip-options.hip
===================================================================
--- clang/test/Driver/hip-options.hip
+++ clang/test/Driver/hip-options.hip
@@ -60,13 +60,30 @@
// Check -foffload-lto=thin translated correctly.
// RUN: %clang -### -target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -nogpuinc -nogpulib \
-// RUN: --cuda-gpu-arch=gfx906 -foffload-lto=thin %s 2>&1 \
-// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=THINLTO %s
+// RUN: --cuda-gpu-arch=gfx906 -foffload-lto=thin -fwhole-program-vtables %s 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=HIPTHINLTO %s
+
+// RUN: %clang -### -target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -nogpuinc -nogpulib \
+// RUN: --cuda-gpu-arch=gfx906 -fgpu-rdc -foffload-lto=thin -fwhole-program-vtables %s 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=HIPTHINLTO %s
+// Ensure we don't error about -fwhole-program-vtables for the non-device offload compile.
+// HIPTHINLTO-NOT: error: invalid argument '-fwhole-program-vtables' only allowed with '-flto'
+// HIPTHINLTO-NOT: clang{{.*}} "-triple" "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" {{.*}} "-flto-unit"
+// HIPTHINLTO: clang{{.*}} "-triple" "amdgcn-amd-amdhsa" {{.*}} "-flto=thin" "-flto-unit" {{.*}} "-fwhole-program-vtables"
+// HIPTHINLTO-NOT: clang{{.*}} "-triple" "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" {{.*}} "-flto-unit"
+// HIPTHINLTO: lld{{.*}}"-plugin-opt=mcpu=gfx906" "-plugin-opt=thinlto" "-plugin-opt=-force-import-all"
+
+// Check that -flto=thin is handled correctly, particularly with -fwhole-program-vtables.
+//
// RUN: %clang -### -target x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -nogpuinc -nogpulib \
-// RUN: --cuda-gpu-arch=gfx906 -fgpu-rdc -foffload-lto=thin %s 2>&1 \
+// RUN: --cuda-gpu-arch=gfx906 -flto=thin -fwhole-program-vtables %s 2>&1 \
// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=THINLTO %s
-// THINLTO-NOT: clang{{.*}} "-triple" "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" {{.*}} "-flto-unit"
-// THINLTO: clang{{.*}} "-triple" "amdgcn-amd-amdhsa" {{.*}} "-flto=thin" "-flto-unit"
-// THINLTO: lld{{.*}}"-plugin-opt=mcpu=gfx906" "-plugin-opt=thinlto" "-plugin-opt=-force-import-all"
+// Ensure we don't error about -fwhole-program-vtables for the device offload compile. We should
+// drop -fwhole-program-vtables for the device offload compile and pass it through for the
+// non-device offload compile along with -flto=thin.
+// THINLTO-NOT: error: invalid argument '-fwhole-program-vtables' only allowed with '-flto'
+// THINLTO-NOT: clang{{.*}}" "-triple" "amdgcn-amd-amdhsa" {{.*}} "-fwhole-program-vtables"
+// THINLTO: clang{{.*}}" "-triple" "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" {{.*}} "-flto=thin" {{.*}} "-fwhole-program-vtables"
+// THINLTO-NOT: clang{{.*}}" "-triple" "amdgcn-amd-amdhsa" {{.*}} "-fwhole-program-vtables"
Index: clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp
+++ clang/lib/Driver/ToolChains/Clang.cpp
@@ -6643,11 +6643,17 @@
}
if (WholeProgramVTables) {
- if (!IsUsingLTO)
+ // Propagate -fwhole-program-vtables if this is an LTO compile.
+ if (IsUsingLTO)
+ CmdArgs.push_back("-fwhole-program-vtables");
+ // Check if we passed LTO options but they were suppressed because this is a
+ // device offloading action, or we passed device offload LTO options which
+ // were suppressed because this is not the device offload action.
+ // Otherwise, issue an error.
+ else if (!D.isUsingLTO(!IsDeviceOffloadAction))
D.Diag(diag::err_drv_argument_only_allowed_with)
<< "-fwhole-program-vtables"
<< "-flto";
- CmdArgs.push_back("-fwhole-program-vtables");
}
bool DefaultsSplitLTOUnit =
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D103579.349431.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3648 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20210603/c4a244f5/attachment-0001.bin>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list