[PATCH] D101259: [clang-tidy] Fix cppcoreguidelines-pro-type-vararg false positives with __builtin_ms_va_list
Paul Robinson via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed May 5 10:40:08 PDT 2021
probinson added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/cppcoreguidelines-pro-type-vararg-ms.cpp:7
+
+// RUN: %check_clang_tidy %s cppcoreguidelines-pro-type-vararg %t
+
----------------
probinson wrote:
> TWeaver wrote:
> > njames93 wrote:
> > > TWeaver wrote:
> > > > Is the missing FileCheck call here on purpose? it seems to me that the CHECK-MESSAGES aren't actually being verified by this test?
> > > >
> > > > unless I'm missing something.
> > > >
> > > > TIA
> > > `check_clang_tidy` invokes FileCheck. Does something else make you think these labels are being tested??
> > whilst investigating an unrelated issue on our internal branch, I tried editting the check lines in this test and wasn't able to create a failure. but if I add
> >
> > '| FileCheck %s -check-prefix=CHECK-MESSAGES' to the run line and then edit the checks, I can induce an error.
> >
> > This could be an issue on our internal branch though... :shrug: thanks for the speedy reply.
> I'm suspicious that our downstream problem is because the test is assuming that the target is Windows, just because the host is. That's not true for us (or anyone with a Windows-hosted cross-compiler). Does clang-tidy accept a target triple?
Or possibly the test could be set up to require a Windows target, rather than a Windows host.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D101259/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D101259
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list