[PATCH] D100739: [Coroutines] Handle overaligned frame allocation (2)

[Xun Li via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

lxfind added a comment.

> Sorry for the confusion. I think either overaligned or under-aligned could be used here to describe the problem: either "Handle overaligned frame" or "Fix under-aligned frame". Since c++ spec defines the former but not the later (https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/object#Alignment), my first intuition was to use the term "overalign". Under-aligned is the undesired outcome that should be fixed (probably too late to handle I assume). Also the overaligned is a static property whereas 'under-aligned" is a runtime property. From the compiler's perspective, I think overaligned should be preferred. With that said, I don't feel strongly about this. I could switch to use "overaligned" if that feels more intuitive.

"Handle" is probably not the right word to be used here. What follows "handle" is typically a legit situation that already occurred but not current handled properly. Here "overaligned frame" doesn't already occur. From what I understand, you really just want to support promise object alignment. So why not just say that directly?
To add on that, I do think you need to describe the problem in more detail in the description. It's indeed still confusing.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D100739/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D100739