[PATCH] D77013: [AMDGPU] Add options -mamdgpu-ieee -mno-amdgpu-ieee
Matt Arsenault via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Apr 20 10:19:35 PDT 2021
arsenm added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp:1951
+ Args.hasFlag(options::OPT_mamdgpu_ieee, options::OPT_mno_amdgpu_ieee,
+ !LangOptsRef.NoHonorNaNs);
+
----------------
yaxunl wrote:
> arsenm wrote:
> > This should not be implied by no honor nans. This is an ABI changing option. We need to require that no nans FP math is enabled to use this mode correctly though
> OK I plan to make changes about this. However I need to clarify about when should we add function attribute amdgpu-ieee=false:
>
> 1. when neither -mamdgpu-ieee nor -mno-amdgpu-ieee is specified, we will add func attr amdgpu-ieee=false if LangOptsRef.NoHonorNaNs is true
>
> 2. when -mamdgpu-ieee or -mno-amdgpu-ieee is specified, we will add func attr amdgpu-ieee=false solely based on these two options, disregarding LangOptsRef.NoHonorNaNs
>
> Is that correct?
# You should only add the attribute "amdgpu-ieee"="false" if and only if -mno-amdgpu-ieee is used. This is entirely orthogonal to NoHonorNaNs. The default is amdgpu-ieee=true, and there's no need to explicitly mark the function
# It is an error to use -mno-amdgpu-ieee without NoHonorNaNs because we do not implement the legalization required to manually quiet signaling nans. We cannot silently drop the use of of this
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77013/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D77013
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list