[PATCH] D99250: [DebugInfo] Fix the mismatching of C++ language tags and Dwarf versions.

[Jinsong Ji via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

jsji added a comment.

I also agree that consumer *SHOULD* handle the unexpected value better.  eg: newer DBX will handle such failures better.

However, there are situations that the end user might not get up to date debugger, then the user experiences will be BAD.

If updating these tags unconditionally not fitting well with the design philosophy, 
will it be acceptable if we introduce *-debugger-tuning=dbx* and only tune these tags conditionally for dbx?

Thanks!


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D99250/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D99250