[clang] 92ccc6c - Reapply "[NPM][CGSCC] FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy: do not clear immutable function passes"

[Mircea Trofin via cfe-commits]

Author: Mircea Trofin
Date: 2021-03-18T09:44:34-07:00
New Revision: 92ccc6cb17a4fd1b9506bac51f2eb1a96f4cd345

URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/92ccc6cb17a4fd1b9506bac51f2eb1a96f4cd345
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/92ccc6cb17a4fd1b9506bac51f2eb1a96f4cd345.diff

LOG: Reapply "[NPM][CGSCC] FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy: do not clear immutable function passes"

This reverts commit 11b70b9e3a7458b5b78c30020b56e8ca563a4801.

The bot failure was due to ArgumentPromotion deleting functions
without deleting their analyses. This was separately fixed in 4b1c807.

Added: 
    

Modified: 
    clang/test/CodeGen/thinlto-distributed-newpm.ll
    llvm/lib/Analysis/CGSCCPassManager.cpp
    llvm/unittests/Analysis/CGSCCPassManagerTest.cpp

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/clang/test/CodeGen/thinlto-distributed-newpm.ll b/clang/test/CodeGen/thinlto-distributed-newpm.ll
index 867203417754..1e9d5d4d2629 100644
--- a/clang/test/CodeGen/thinlto-distributed-newpm.ll
+++ b/clang/test/CodeGen/thinlto-distributed-newpm.ll
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 ; RUN: %clang -target x86_64-grtev4-linux-gnu \
 ; RUN:   -O2 -fexperimental-new-pass-manager -Xclang -fdebug-pass-manager \
 ; RUN:   -c -fthinlto-index=%t.o.thinlto.bc \
-; RUN:   -o %t.native.o -x ir %t.o 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefixes=CHECK-O,CHECK-O2 %s --dump-input=fail
+; RUN:   -o %t.native.o -x ir %t.o 2>&1 | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHECK-O %s --dump-input=fail
 
 ; RUN: %clang -target x86_64-grtev4-linux-gnu \
 ; RUN:   -O3 -fexperimental-new-pass-manager -Xclang -fdebug-pass-manager \
@@ -70,24 +70,19 @@
 ; CHECK-O: Starting CGSCC pass manager run.
 ; CHECK-O: Running pass: InlinerPass on (main)
 ; CHECK-O: Running pass: PostOrderFunctionAttrsPass on (main)
-; CHECK-O: Clearing all analysis results for: main
+; CHECK-O: Invalidating analysis: DominatorTreeAnalysis on main
+; CHECK-O: Invalidating analysis: BasicAA on main
+; CHECK-O: Invalidating analysis: AAManager on main
 ; CHECK-O3: Running pass: ArgumentPromotionPass on (main)
-; CHECK-O3: Running analysis: TargetIRAnalysis on main
 ; CHECK-O: Starting {{.*}}Function pass manager run.
 ; CHECK-O: Running pass: SROA on main
 ; These next two can appear in any order since they are accessed as parameters
 ; on the same call to SROA::runImpl
 ; CHECK-O-DAG: Running analysis: DominatorTreeAnalysis on main
-; CHECK-O-DAG: Running analysis: AssumptionAnalysis on main
 ; CHECK-O: Running pass: EarlyCSEPass on main
-; CHECK-O: Running analysis: TargetLibraryAnalysis on main
-; CHECK-O2: Running analysis: TargetIRAnalysis on main
 ; CHECK-O: Running analysis: MemorySSAAnalysis on main
 ; CHECK-O: Running analysis: AAManager on main
 ; CHECK-O: Running analysis: BasicAA on main
-; CHECK-O: Running analysis: ScopedNoAliasAA on main
-; CHECK-O: Running analysis: TypeBasedAA on main
-; CHECK-O: Running analysis: OuterAnalysisManagerProxy
 ; CHECK-O: Running pass: SpeculativeExecutionPass on main
 ; CHECK-O: Running pass: JumpThreadingPass on main
 ; CHECK-O: Running analysis: LazyValueAnalysis on main
@@ -96,7 +91,6 @@
 ; CHECK-O: Running pass: SimplifyCFGPass on main
 ; CHECK-O3: Running pass: AggressiveInstCombinePass on main
 ; CHECK-O: Running pass: InstCombinePass on main
-; CHECK-O: Running analysis: OptimizationRemarkEmitterAnalysis on main
 ; CHECK-O: Running pass: LibCallsShrinkWrapPass on main
 ; CHECK-O: Running pass: TailCallElimPass on main
 ; CHECK-O: Running pass: SimplifyCFGPass on main

diff  --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/CGSCCPassManager.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/CGSCCPassManager.cpp
index 9dc62b877ae2..eaaa3d09a7f2 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/CGSCCPassManager.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/CGSCCPassManager.cpp
@@ -720,7 +720,7 @@ bool FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy::Result::invalidate(
   auto PAC = PA.getChecker<FunctionAnalysisManagerCGSCCProxy>();
   if (!PAC.preserved() && !PAC.preservedSet<AllAnalysesOn<LazyCallGraph::SCC>>()) {
     for (LazyCallGraph::Node &N : C)
-      FAM->clear(N.getFunction(), N.getFunction().getName());
+      FAM->invalidate(N.getFunction(), PA);
 
     return false;
   }

diff  --git a/llvm/unittests/Analysis/CGSCCPassManagerTest.cpp b/llvm/unittests/Analysis/CGSCCPassManagerTest.cpp
index 59ff97d0fc1a..ceaeaaf83e5d 100644
--- a/llvm/unittests/Analysis/CGSCCPassManagerTest.cpp
+++ b/llvm/unittests/Analysis/CGSCCPassManagerTest.cpp
@@ -1942,5 +1942,30 @@ TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, TestInsertionOfNewNonTrivialCallEdge) {
   ASSERT_TRUE(Ran);
 }
 
+TEST_F(CGSCCPassManagerTest, TestFunctionPassesAreQueriedForInvalidation) {
+  std::unique_ptr<Module> M = parseIR("define void @f() { ret void }");
+  CGSCCPassManager CGPM;
+  bool SCCCalled = false;
+  FunctionPassManager FPM;
+  int ImmRuns = 0;
+  FAM.registerPass([&] { return TestImmutableFunctionAnalysis(ImmRuns); });
+  FPM.addPass(RequireAnalysisPass<TestImmutableFunctionAnalysis, Function>());
+  CGPM.addPass(
+      LambdaSCCPass([&](LazyCallGraph::SCC &C, CGSCCAnalysisManager &AM,
+                        LazyCallGraph &CG, CGSCCUpdateResult &UR) {
+        SCCCalled = true;
+        return PreservedAnalyses::none();
+      }));
+  CGPM.addPass(createCGSCCToFunctionPassAdaptor(
+      RequireAnalysisPass<TestImmutableFunctionAnalysis, Function>()));
+  ModulePassManager MPM;
+
+  MPM.addPass(createModuleToFunctionPassAdaptor(std::move(FPM)));
+  MPM.addPass(createModuleToPostOrderCGSCCPassAdaptor(std::move(CGPM)));
+  MPM.run(*M, MAM);
+  ASSERT_EQ(ImmRuns, 1);
+  ASSERT_TRUE(SCCCalled);
+}
+
 #endif
 } // namespace