[PATCH] D93377: [Clang] Add __ibm128 type to represent ppc_fp128
Jonathan Wakely via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Mar 12 23:58:07 PST 2021
jwakely added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Parse/ParseExprCXX.cpp:2245
+ case tok::kw___ibm128:
+ DS.SetTypeSpecType(DeclSpec::TST_ibm128, Loc, PrevSpec, DiagID, Policy);
+ break;
----------------
hubert.reinterpretcast wrote:
> qiucf wrote:
> > hubert.reinterpretcast wrote:
> > > qiucf wrote:
> > > > hubert.reinterpretcast wrote:
> > > > > Not sure what the best method is to implement this, but `long double` and `__ibm128` are the same type for GCC when `-mabi=ibmlongdouble` is in effect.
> > > > Seems clang is also different from GCC under `-mabi=ieeelongdouble`? I saw `__float128` and `long double` are the same for GCC but not for clang.
> > > Have you checked whether the new libstdc++ for which this support is being added needs the GCC behaviour to work properly?
> > >
> > > The GCC behaviour allows the following to be compiled without introducing novel overload resolution tiebreakers:
> > > ```
> > > void f(__float128);
> > > void f(__ibm128);
> > > void f(int);
> > >
> > > long double ld;
> > >
> > > int main() { f(ld); }
> > > ```
> > As I saw both GCC and clang have error for ambiguous `operator<<` for:
> >
> > ```
> > std::cout << "long double:\n";
> > std::cout << std::numeric_limits<long double>::max() << std::endl;
> > std::cout << std::numeric_limits<long double>::min() << std::endl;
> >
> > std::cout << "__float128:\n";
> > std::cout << std::numeric_limits<__float128>::max() << std::endl;
> > std::cout << std::numeric_limits<__float128>::min() << std::endl;
> >
> > std::cout << "__ibm128:\n";
> > std::cout << std::numeric_limits<__ibm128>::max() << std::endl;
> > std::cout << std::numeric_limits<__ibm128>::min() << std::endl;
> > ```
> @jwakely, are the overload resolution errors expected? @qiucf, are you sure you have a sufficiently new libstdc++?
> @jwakely, are the overload resolution errors expected?
Yes. Iostreams support `long double` but not `__float128`, unless that happens to be the same type as `long double` (due to a `-mabi=ieeelongdouble` option).
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D93377/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D93377
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list