[PATCH] D93594: [X86] Pass to transform amx intrinsics to scalar operation.

LuoYuanke via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Mar 2 01:24:17 PST 2021


LuoYuanke added inline comments.


================
Comment at: llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86LowerAMXIntrinsics.cpp:311
+  Value *ResElt = B.CreateAdd(EltC, SubVecR);
+  Value *NewVecC = B.CreateInsertElement(VecCPhi, ResElt, IdxC);
+  Value *NewVecD = B.CreateInsertElement(VecDPhi, ResElt, IdxC);
----------------
yubing wrote:
> pengfei wrote:
> > yubing wrote:
> > > pengfei wrote:
> > > > Is it necessary to insert the ResElt to VecC?
> > > Yes, it is necessary since you should use updated eltC(aka, Cij) when you are doing matrix dotproduct:
> > > Cij =Cij+Ai1.*B1j
> > > Cij =Cij+Ai2.*B2j
> > > ....
> > > Cij =Cij+AiK.*BKj
> > But you don't need to update both C and D. Something like the psudo code should enough:
> > ```
> > for (k : K)
> >   Dij += Aik * Bkj;
> > Dij += Cij
> > ```
> I change code into the following style, and it can also reduce inner loop's size:
> ```
> for (k : K)
>   Cij += Aik * Bkj;
> Dij = Cij
> ```
> Besides, I hoist the procedure of calculating (i,j)'s linear index above inner loops.
It seems keeping vector C unchanged is simpler. We can eliminate the phi, extract and insert instruction for vector C.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D93594/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D93594



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list