[PATCH] D93298: [RISCV] add the MC layer support of Zfinx extension

luxufan via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Feb 5 05:27:09 PST 2021


StephenFan added a comment.

In D93298#2544775 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D93298#2544775>, @asb wrote:

> In D93298#2544459 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D93298#2544459>, @StephenFan wrote:
>
>> According to  @jrtc27 's review that is 
>> "As for Zfinx itself, well, the idea is fine, but I really detest the way it's being done as an extension to F/D/Zfh. Running F code on an FZfh core _does not work_ so it is not an _extension_. Instead it should really be a set of separate extensions to I/E that conflict with F/D/Zfh, i.e. Zfinx, Zdinx and Zfhinx, but apparently asking code that complies with a ratified standard to change itself in order to not break when a new extension is introduced is a-ok in the RISC-V world.". 
>> We split the Zfinx into 3 separate extensions which is Zfinx, Zdinx, and Zfhinx.
>
> Ah I see. I interpreted jrtc27's comment as a general gripe about the spec (which perhaps could be relayed to those working on the zfinx spec) rather as a direction for changing this patch in particular. Anyway, it's a detail that shouldn't affect an initial review. Thanks for clarifying.

Oh, I'm sorry. It seems that I misunderstood @jrtc27 's comment. I will merge the Zfinx, Zdinx, Zfhinx into Zfinx if this patch is ready for accepting.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D93298/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D93298



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list