[clang] 95114f2 - [clang][cli] Do not marshall only CC1Option flags in BoolOption

Jan Svoboda via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Dec 16 00:50:59 PST 2020


Author: Jan Svoboda
Date: 2020-12-16T09:29:40+01:00
New Revision: 95114f21f5bf1704672dadb45ca7c25efca72e03

URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/95114f21f5bf1704672dadb45ca7c25efca72e03
DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/95114f21f5bf1704672dadb45ca7c25efca72e03.diff

LOG: [clang][cli] Do not marshall only CC1Option flags in BoolOption

We cannot be sure whether a flag is CC1Option inside the definition of `BoolOption`. Take the example below:

```
let Flags = [CC1Option] in {
  defm xxx : BoolOption<...>;
}
```

where TableGen applies `Flags = [CC1Option]` to the `xxx` and `no_xxx` records **after** they have been is fully declared by `BoolOption`.

For the refactored `-f[no-]debug-pass-manager` flags (see the diff), this means `BoolOption` never adds any marshalling info, as it doesn't see either of the flags as `CC1Option`.

For that reason, we should defensively append the marshalling information to both flags inside `BoolOption`. Now the check for `CC1Option` needs to happen later, in the parsing macro, when all TableGen logic has been resolved.

However, for some flags defined through `BoolOption`, we can run into issues:

```
// Options.td
def fenable_xxx : /* ... */;

// Both flags are CC1Option, the first is implied.
defm xxx : BoolOption<"xxx,
  "Opts.Xxx", DefaultsToFalse,
  ChangedBy<PosFlag, [CC1Option], "", [fenable_xxx]>,
  ResetBy<NegFlag, [CC1Option]>>;
```

When parsing `clang -cc1 -fenable-xxx`:
* we run parsing for `PosFlag`:
  * set `Opts.Xxx` to default `false`,
  * discover `PosFlag` is implied by `-fenable-xxx`: set `Opts.Xxx` to `true`,
  * don't see `-fxxx` on command line: do nothing,
* we run parsing for `NegFlag`:
  * set `Opts.Xxx` to default `false`,
  * discover `NegFlag` cannot be implied: do nothing,
  * don't see `-fno-xxx` on command line: do nothing.

Now we ended up with `Opts.Xxx` set to `false` instead of `true`. For this reason, we need to ensure to append the same `ImpliedByAnyOf` instance to both flags.

This means both parsing runs now behave identically (they set the same default value, run the same "implied by" check, and call `makeBooleanOptionNormalizer` that already has information on both flags, so it returns the same value in both calls).

The solution works well, but what might be confusing is this: you have defined a flag **A** that is not `CC1Option`, but can be implied by another flag **B** that is `CC1Option`:
* if **A** is defined manually, it will never get implied, as the code never runs
```
def no_signed_zeros : Flag<["-"], "fno-signed-zeros">, Group<f_Group>, Flags<[]>,
  MarshallingInfoFlag<"LangOpts->NoSignedZero">, ImpliedByAnyOf<[menable_unsafe_fp_math]>;
```
* if **A** is defined by `BoolOption`, it could get implied, as the code is run by its `CC1Option` counterpart:
```
defm signed_zeros : BoolOption<"signed-zeros",
  "LangOpts->NoSignedZero", DefaultsToFalse,
  ChangedBy<NegFlag, [], "Allow optimizations that ignore the sign of floating point zeros",
            [cl_no_signed_zeros, menable_unsafe_fp_math]>,
  ResetBy<PosFlag, [CC1Option]>, "f">, Group<f_Group>;
```

This is a surprising inconsistency.

One solution might be to somehow propagate the final `Flags` of the implied flag in `ImpliedByAnyOf` and check whether it has `CC1Option` in the parsing macro. However, I think it doesn't make sense to spend time thinking about a corner case that won't come up in real code.

An observation: it is unfortunate that the marshalling information is a part of the flag definition. If we represented it in a separate structure, we could avoid the "double parsing" problem by having a single source of truth. This would require a lot of additional work though.

Note: the original patch missed the `CC1Option` check in the parsing macro, making my reasoning here incomplete. Moreover, it contained a change to denormalization that wasn't necessarily related to these changes, so I've extracted that to a follow-up patch: D93094.

Reviewed By: dexonsmith, Bigcheese

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93008

Added: 
    

Modified: 
    clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td
    clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp
    clang/unittests/Frontend/CompilerInvocationTest.cpp

Removed: 
    


################################################################################
diff  --git a/clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td b/clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td
index f3aa6750b794..0da6a43b6986 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td
@@ -325,10 +325,6 @@ class FlagDefExpanded<FlagDef flag, string prefix, string name, string spelling>
   string Spelling
     = prefix#!cond(flag.Polarity.Value : "", true : "no-")#spelling;
 
-  // Does the flag have CC1Option?
-  bit IsCC1 = !not(!empty(!filter(opt_flag, flag.OptionFlags,
-                                  !eq(opt_flag, CC1Option))));
-
   // Can the flag be implied by another flag?
   bit CanBeImplied = !not(!empty(flag.ImpliedBy));
 
@@ -336,18 +332,14 @@ class FlagDefExpanded<FlagDef flag, string prefix, string name, string spelling>
   code ValueAsCode = !cond(flag.Value : "true", true: "false");
 }
 
-// Creates simple flag record.
-class BoolOptionFlag<FlagDefExpanded flag, code keypath, Default default>
-  : Flag<["-"], flag.Spelling>, Flags<flag.OptionFlags>, HelpText<flag.Help> {}
-
-// Creates marshalled flag record.
-class CC1BoolOptionFlag<FlagDefExpanded flag, FlagDefExpanded other,
-                        code keypath, Default default>
+// Creates record with a marshalled flag.
+class BoolOptionFlag<FlagDefExpanded flag, FlagDefExpanded other,
+                     FlagDefExpanded implied, code keypath, Default default>
   : Flag<["-"], flag.Spelling>, Flags<flag.OptionFlags>, HelpText<flag.Help>,
     MarshallingInfoBooleanFlag<keypath, default.Value, flag.ValueAsCode,
                                flag.RecordName, other.ValueAsCode,
                                other.RecordName, other.Spelling>,
-    ImpliedByAnyOf<flag.ImpliedBy, flag.ValueAsCode> {}
+    ImpliedByAnyOf<implied.ImpliedBy, implied.ValueAsCode> {}
 
 // Generates TableGen records for two command line flags that control the same
 // keypath via the marshalling infrastructure.
@@ -370,17 +362,10 @@ multiclass BoolOptionBase<string spelling_base, code keypath, Default default,
   // TODO: Assert that the flags have 
diff erent value.
   // TODO: Assert that only one of the flags can be implied.
 
-  if flag1.IsCC1 then {
-    def flag1.RecordName : CC1BoolOptionFlag<flag1, flag2, keypath, default>;
-  } else {
-    def flag1.RecordName : BoolOptionFlag<flag1, keypath, default>;
-  }
-
-  if flag2.IsCC1 then {
-    def flag2.RecordName : CC1BoolOptionFlag<flag2, flag1, keypath, default>;
-  } else {
-    def flag2.RecordName : BoolOptionFlag<flag2, keypath, default>;
-  }
+  defvar implied = !cond(flag1.CanBeImplied: flag1, true: flag2);
+
+  def flag1.RecordName : BoolOptionFlag<flag1, flag2, implied, keypath, default>;
+  def flag2.RecordName : BoolOptionFlag<flag2, flag1, implied, keypath, default>;
 }
 
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
@@ -4322,10 +4307,11 @@ def flto_visibility_public_std:
 def flto_unit: Flag<["-"], "flto-unit">,
     HelpText<"Emit IR to support LTO unit features (CFI, whole program vtable opt)">;
 def fno_lto_unit: Flag<["-"], "fno-lto-unit">;
-def fdebug_pass_manager : Flag<["-"], "fdebug-pass-manager">,
-    HelpText<"Prints debug information for the new pass manager">;
-def fno_debug_pass_manager : Flag<["-"], "fno-debug-pass-manager">,
-    HelpText<"Disables debug printing for the new pass manager">;
+defm debug_pass_manager : BoolOption<"debug-pass-manager",
+  "CodeGenOpts.DebugPassManager", DefaultsToFalse,
+  ChangedBy<PosFlag, [], "Prints debug information for the new pass manager">,
+  ResetBy<NegFlag, [], "Disables debug printing for the new pass manager">,
+  BothFlags<[]>, "f">;
 def fexperimental_debug_variable_locations : Flag<["-"],
     "fexperimental-debug-variable-locations">,
     HelpText<"Use experimental new value-tracking variable locations">;

diff  --git a/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp b/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp
index 23c4ad8dc516..1a863a739156 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp
@@ -869,10 +869,6 @@ static bool ParseCodeGenArgs(CodeGenOptions &Opts, ArgList &Args, InputKind IK,
     }
   }
 
-  Opts.DebugPassManager =
-      Args.hasFlag(OPT_fdebug_pass_manager, OPT_fno_debug_pass_manager,
-                   /* Default */ false);
-
   if (Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(OPT_fveclib)) {
     StringRef Name = A->getValue();
     if (Name == "Accelerate")
@@ -3767,7 +3763,7 @@ bool CompilerInvocation::parseSimpleArgs(const ArgList &Args,
     HELPTEXT, METAVAR, VALUES, SPELLING, ALWAYS_EMIT, KEYPATH, DEFAULT_VALUE,  \
     IMPLIED_CHECK, IMPLIED_VALUE, NORMALIZER, DENORMALIZER, MERGER, EXTRACTOR, \
     TABLE_INDEX)                                                               \
-  {                                                                            \
+  if ((FLAGS)&options::CC1Option) {                                            \
     this->KEYPATH = MERGER(this->KEYPATH, DEFAULT_VALUE);                      \
     if (IMPLIED_CHECK)                                                         \
       this->KEYPATH = MERGER(this->KEYPATH, IMPLIED_VALUE);                    \

diff  --git a/clang/unittests/Frontend/CompilerInvocationTest.cpp b/clang/unittests/Frontend/CompilerInvocationTest.cpp
index 41da5affdb73..156e3393acd6 100644
--- a/clang/unittests/Frontend/CompilerInvocationTest.cpp
+++ b/clang/unittests/Frontend/CompilerInvocationTest.cpp
@@ -238,6 +238,55 @@ TEST_F(CommandLineTest, BoolOptionDefaultArbitraryTwoFlagsPresentReset) {
   ASSERT_THAT(GeneratedArgs, Not(Contains(StrEq(PassManagerChangedByFlag))));
 }
 
+// Boolean option that gets the CC1Option flag from a let statement (which
+// is applied **after** the record is defined):
+//
+//   let Flags = [CC1Option] in {
+//     defm option : BoolOption<...>;
+//   }
+
+TEST_F(CommandLineTest, BoolOptionCC1ViaLetPresentNone) {
+  const char *Args[] = {""};
+
+  CompilerInvocation::CreateFromArgs(Invocation, Args, *Diags);
+
+  ASSERT_FALSE(Diags->hasErrorOccurred());
+  ASSERT_FALSE(Invocation.getCodeGenOpts().DebugPassManager);
+
+  Invocation.generateCC1CommandLine(GeneratedArgs, *this);
+
+  ASSERT_THAT(GeneratedArgs, Not(Contains(StrEq("-fdebug-pass-manager"))));
+  ASSERT_THAT(GeneratedArgs, Not(Contains(StrEq("-fno-debug-pass-manager"))));
+}
+
+TEST_F(CommandLineTest, BoolOptionCC1ViaLetPresentPos) {
+  const char *Args[] = {"-fdebug-pass-manager"};
+
+  CompilerInvocation::CreateFromArgs(Invocation, Args, *Diags);
+
+  ASSERT_FALSE(Diags->hasErrorOccurred());
+  ASSERT_TRUE(Invocation.getCodeGenOpts().DebugPassManager);
+
+  Invocation.generateCC1CommandLine(GeneratedArgs, *this);
+
+  ASSERT_THAT(GeneratedArgs, Contains(StrEq("-fdebug-pass-manager")));
+  ASSERT_THAT(GeneratedArgs, Not(Contains(StrEq("-fno-debug-pass-manager"))));
+}
+
+TEST_F(CommandLineTest, BoolOptionCC1ViaLetPresentNeg) {
+  const char *Args[] = {"-fno-debug-pass-manager"};
+
+  CompilerInvocation::CreateFromArgs(Invocation, Args, *Diags);
+
+  ASSERT_FALSE(Diags->hasErrorOccurred());
+  ASSERT_FALSE(Invocation.getCodeGenOpts().DebugPassManager);
+
+  Invocation.generateCC1CommandLine(GeneratedArgs, *this);
+
+  ASSERT_THAT(GeneratedArgs, Not(Contains(StrEq("-fno-debug-pass-manager"))));
+  ASSERT_THAT(GeneratedArgs, Not(Contains(StrEq("-fdebug-pass-manager"))));
+}
+
 TEST_F(CommandLineTest, CanGenerateCC1CommandLineFlag) {
   const char *Args[] = {"-fmodules-strict-context-hash"};
 


        


More information about the cfe-commits mailing list