[PATCH] D92354: [clang] add a new `swift_attr` attribute
Alex Lorenz via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Dec 4 09:29:03 PST 2020
arphaman added a comment.
Thanks for taking a look.
In D92354#2428604 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D92354#2428604>, @erik.pilkington wrote:
> Do we need to add APINotes support for this?
Not at the moment, maybe in the future
================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/Attr.td:2153
+def SwiftAttr : InheritableAttr {
+ let Spellings = [Clang<"swift_attr">];
+ let Args = [StringArgument<"Attribute">];
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> The other swift attributes use a GNU spelling and don't expose any C++ spelling. Should this follow suit (or should the other attributes be updated)?
You're right, that was my mistake. Changed it to `GNU`.
================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/Attr.td:2155
+ let Args = [StringArgument<"Attribute">];
+ let Documentation = [SwiftAttrDocs];
+}
----------------
erik.pilkington wrote:
> Should we limit this to appear on certain subjects? Presumably the swift importer is only going to look for this in certain places, so I think it makes sense to call out places where it'll be ignored in clang. WDYT?
I think we want to leave it as a flexible attribute that can be applied to any declaration for now, and let the Swift importer decide on which declarations it wants to support them.
================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/AttrDocs.td:3635
+ let Content = [{
+The ``swift_attr`` provides a Swift-specific annotation for the declaration
+to which the attribute appertains to. This kind of annotation is ignored by
----------------
aaron.ballman wrote:
> What declarations does this attribute appertain to?
Mentioned that it can be applied to any declaration.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D92354/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D92354
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list