[PATCH] D90392: [clang-tidy] Omit std::make_unique/make_shared for default initialization.
Stephen Kelly via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Nov 8 09:50:11 PST 2020
steveire added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/test/clang-tidy/checkers/modernize-make-shared.cpp:51
// CHECK-FIXES: std::shared_ptr<int> P1 = std::make_shared<int>();
+ std::shared_ptr<int> P2 = std::shared_ptr<int>(new int);
----------------
ckennelly wrote:
> steveire wrote:
> > I'm a bit confused. Why don't we want to transform this?
> `std::make_shared<int>()` is equivalent to `std::shared_ptr<int>(new int())`. This value initializes (read: zeroes out the value).
>
> The statement here is only default initializing (read: leaves the value uninitialized). For this use case, we should use `std::make_shared_for_overwrite` when it is available.
I see. Did you consider an option to transform these anyway? It seems at least as likely that for real-world code bases they are not initialized accidentally (as opposed to being a deliberate choice as assumed here).
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D90392/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D90392
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list