[PATCH] D90174: [HIP] Fix regressions due to fp contract change

[John McCall via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

rjmccall added a comment.

Okay.  It sounds like strict compatibility with GCC implies ignoring pragmas in fast, and that's what we're most concerned with, since this is originally a GCC option.  So the only question I have now is whether `faststd` is the best name for this.  Does anyone want to suggest an alternative?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D90174/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D90174