[PATCH] D90275: [clang][IR] Add support for leaf attribute
Juneyoung Lee via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Nov 4 20:45:46 PST 2020
aqjune added a comment.
In D90275#2374648 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D90275#2374648>, @gulfem wrote:
> Leaf attribute is specifically intended for library functions and I think all the existing usage of leaf attribute is in the library function declarations.
> For ex, it is only used in syscalls in Fuchsia.
> Therefore, I'm not sure whether it is really necessary to ban leaf attribute in function definitions.
> Even though function attributes are typically intended to be used in the function declaration, compilers do not have policy to forbid using them in the function definition.
Maybe it's because the `leaf` (or `nocallback` or whatever) attribute at the function definition in IR can't be used for any optimization?
For the callers, `leaf` attribute at the function declarations is already giving the information.
But the attribute at function definitions really give no additional information inside the TU, so it's redundant.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D90275/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D90275
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list