[PATCH] D88295: [Sema] Fix volatile check when test if a return object can be implicitly move
Yang Fan via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Oct 29 23:56:01 PDT 2020
nullptr.cpp updated this revision to Diff 301822.
nullptr.cpp added a comment.
rebase
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D88295/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D88295
Files:
clang/lib/Sema/SemaStmt.cpp
clang/test/CXX/special/class.copy/copy-elision.cpp
Index: clang/test/CXX/special/class.copy/copy-elision.cpp
===================================================================
--- /dev/null
+++ clang/test/CXX/special/class.copy/copy-elision.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -emit-llvm -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -o - %s | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++17 -emit-llvm -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -o - %s | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++14 -emit-llvm -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -o - %s | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++11 -emit-llvm -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -o - %s | FileCheck %s
+
+// - volatile object in return statement don't match the rule for using move
+// operation instead of copy operation. Thus should call the copy constructor
+// A(const volatile A &).
+//
+// - volatile object in return statement also don't match the rule for copy
+// elision. Thus the copy constructor A(const volatile A &) cannot be elided.
+namespace test_volatile {
+class A {
+public:
+ A() {}
+ ~A() {}
+ A(const volatile A &);
+ A(volatile A &&);
+};
+
+A test() {
+ volatile A a_copy;
+ // CHECK: call void @_ZN13test_volatile1AC1ERVKS0_
+ return a_copy;
+}
+} // namespace test_volatile
Index: clang/lib/Sema/SemaStmt.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/Sema/SemaStmt.cpp
+++ clang/lib/Sema/SemaStmt.cpp
@@ -3059,12 +3059,13 @@
// variable will no longer be used.
if (VD->hasAttr<BlocksAttr>()) return false;
+ // ...non-volatile...
+ if (VD->getType().isVolatileQualified())
+ return false;
+
if (CESK & CES_AllowDifferentTypes)
return true;
- // ...non-volatile...
- if (VD->getType().isVolatileQualified()) return false;
-
// Variables with higher required alignment than their type's ABI
// alignment cannot use NRVO.
if (!VD->getType()->isDependentType() && VD->hasAttr<AlignedAttr>() &&
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D88295.301822.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1906 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20201030/0120705c/attachment.bin>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list