[PATCH] D88566: be more specific when testing for no fuse-ld warnings

Tue Oct 27 09:46:49 PDT 2020

stuij added a comment.

> If this cannot be reproduced with the OSS LLVM, I am not sure you should adjust such a test.

Ok, fair enough. Thanks for the comment.

================
Comment at: clang/test/Driver/fuse-ld.c:15
 // RUN:   FileCheck %s --check-prefix=CHECK-NO-WARN
-// CHECK-NO-WARN-NOT: warning:
+// CHECK-NO-WARN-NOT: warning: 'fuse-ld'

----------------
MaskRay wrote:
> stuij wrote:
> > MaskRay wrote:
> > > How does this line trigger unrelated warnings? Can you dump it?
> > see my top-level comment
> The impoerant bit is that the original message disallows any warning. The new message with an incorrect 'fuse-ld' (instead of '-fuse-ld') seems really questionable.
Ai, a typo :(

Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D88566/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D88566