[PATCH] D86765: [clang] Don't emit "no member" diagnostic if the lookup fails on an invalid record decl.

[Haojian Wu via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

hokein updated this revision to Diff 294635.
hokein marked an inline comment as done.
hokein added a comment.

Fix a comment.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D86765/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D86765

Files:
  clang/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
  clang/test/SemaCXX/access-base-class.cpp
  libcxx/test/libcxx/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/function_type_default_deleter.fail.cpp


Index: libcxx/test/libcxx/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/function_type_default_deleter.fail.cpp
===================================================================
--- libcxx/test/libcxx/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/function_type_default_deleter.fail.cpp
+++ libcxx/test/libcxx/utilities/memory/util.smartptr/util.smartptr.shared/function_type_default_deleter.fail.cpp
@@ -45,8 +45,6 @@
     SPtr<3> s3(nullptr, Deleter{}); // OK
   }
   // expected-error-re at memory:* 2 {{static_assert failed{{.*}} "default_delete cannot be instantiated for function types"}}
-  // FIXME: suppress this bogus diagnostic, see https://reviews.llvm.org/D86685.
-  // expected-error at memory:* 0+ {{no member named 'value' in}}
   {
     SPtr<4> s4(getFn<4>()); // expected-note {{requested here}}
     SPtr<5> s5(getFn<5>(), std::default_delete<FnType<5>>{}); // expected-note {{requested here}}
Index: clang/test/SemaCXX/access-base-class.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/test/SemaCXX/access-base-class.cpp
+++ clang/test/SemaCXX/access-base-class.cpp
@@ -89,3 +89,29 @@
   };
 }
 
+namespace T8 {
+template <int>
+struct flag {
+  static constexpr bool value = true;
+};
+
+template <class T>
+struct trait : flag<sizeof(T)> {};
+
+template <class T, bool Inferred = trait<T>::value>
+struct a {};
+
+template <class T>
+class b {
+  a<T> x;
+  using U = a<T>;
+};
+
+template <int>
+struct Impossible {
+  static_assert(false, ""); // expected-error {{static_assert failed}}
+};
+
+// verify "no member named 'value'" bogus diagnostic is not emitted.
+trait<b<Impossible<0>>>::value;
+} // namespace T8
Index: clang/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
+++ clang/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
@@ -2581,6 +2581,13 @@
                                      NameInfo, /*TemplateArgs=*/nullptr);
 
   if (R.empty()) {
+    // Don't diagnose problems with invalid record decl, the secondary no_member
+    // diagnostic during template instantiation is likely bogus, e.g. if a class
+    // is invalid because it's derived from an invalid base class, then missing
+    // members were likely supposed to be inherited.
+    if (const auto *CD = dyn_cast<CXXRecordDecl>(DC))
+      if (CD->isInvalidDecl())
+        return ExprError();
     Diag(NameInfo.getLoc(), diag::err_no_member)
       << NameInfo.getName() << DC << SS.getRange();
     return ExprError();


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D86765.294635.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 2508 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20200928/cd07a836/attachment.bin>