[PATCH] D86790: [FE] Use preferred alignment instead of ABI alignment for complete object when applicable
James Y Knight via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Sep 23 16:35:26 PDT 2020
jyknight added a comment.
I'm happy with this now, but please update the commit message to match the updated change.
================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/AST/ASTContext.h:2177-2179
/// This can be different than the ABI alignment in cases where it is
- /// beneficial for performance to overalign a data type.
+ /// beneficial for performance or backwards compatibility preserving to
+ /// overalign a data type.
----------------
Rather than the phrase you added, I'd instead add a new sentence:
"Note: despite the name, the preferred alignment is ABI-impacting, and not an optimization."
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D86790/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D86790
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list