[PATCH] D87921: Fix -funique-internal-linkage-names to work with -O2 and new pass manager

[Sriraman Tallam via cfe-commits]

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 5:58 PM Matt Morehouse via Phabricator
<reviews at reviews.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> morehouse added a comment.
>
> This change appears to trigger an assertion failure in sysmsg.c on the PPC bot:  http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-ppc64le-linux-lnt/builds/26845/steps/ninja%20check%
>
>   ******************** TEST 'SanitizerCommon-msan-powerpc64le-Linux :: Linux/sysmsg.c' FAILED ********************
>   Script:
>   --
>   : 'RUN: at line 1';      /home/buildbots/ppc64le-clang-lnt-test/clang-ppc64le-lnt/stage1/./bin/clang  -gline-tables-only -fsanitize=memory  -m64 -fno-function-sections  -ldl -O1 /home/buildbots/ppc64le-clang-lnt-test/clang-ppc64le-lnt/llvm/compiler-rt/test/sanitizer_common/TestCases/Linux/sysmsg.c -o /home/buildbots/ppc64le-clang-lnt-test/clang-ppc64le-lnt/stage1/projects/compiler-rt/test/sanitizer_common/msan-powerpc64le-Linux/Linux/Output/sysmsg.c.tmp &&  /home/buildbots/ppc64le-clang-lnt-test/clang-ppc64le-lnt/stage1/projects/compiler-rt/test/sanitizer_common/msan-powerpc64le-Linux/Linux/Output/sysmsg.c.tmp
>   --
>   Exit Code: 134
>
>   Command Output (stderr):
>   --
>   sysmsg.c.tmp: /home/buildbots/ppc64le-clang-lnt-test/clang-ppc64le-lnt/llvm/compiler-rt/test/sanitizer_common/TestCases/Linux/sysmsg.c:14: int main(): Assertion `msgq != -1' failed.
>   /home/buildbots/ppc64le-clang-lnt-test/clang-ppc64le-lnt/stage1/projects/compiler-rt/test/sanitizer_common/msan-powerpc64le-Linux/Linux/Output/sysmsg.c.script: line 1: 2982426 Aborted                 (core dumped) /home/buildbots/ppc64le-clang-lnt-test/clang-ppc64le-lnt/stage1/projects/compiler-rt/test/sanitizer_common/msan-powerpc64le-Linux/Linux/Output/sysmsg.c.tmp
>
>   --
>
> It's not immediately obvious to me what is going wrong.  If you could take a look, I'd appreciate it.  Otherwise I will look closer tomorrow.

I am having trouble getting access to a PPC machine,  this is going to
take me longer. Should I revert the patch?

Thanks
Sri

>
>
> Repository:
>   rG LLVM Github Monorepo
>
> CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
>   https://reviews.llvm.org/D87921/new/
>
> https://reviews.llvm.org/D87921
>