[PATCH] D87201: [clang-format] Add a option for the position of Java static import
MyDeveloperDay via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Sep 8 07:50:51 PDT 2020
MyDeveloperDay added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst:1970
+ but this behavior is changed by another option,
+ ``JavaStaticImportAfterImport``.
----------------
Can you add a test that shows if the sorting is still in the groups, i.e. I can't tell if
```
import com.test.a;
import static org.a;
import com.test.b;
import static org.b;
```
becomes
```
import static org.a;
import static org.b;
import com.test.a;
import com.test.b;
```
or
```
import static org.a;
import static org.b;
import com.test.a;
import com.test.b;
```
or
```
import static org.a;
import com.test.a;
import static org.b;
import com.test.b;
```
================
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Format/Format.h:1708
+ /// \endcode
+ bool JavaStaticImportAfterImport;
+
----------------
Can we consider changing the name or the option to make it clearer what its for?
`SortJavaStaticImport`
and make it an enumeration rather than true/false
`Before,After,Never`
There need to be a "don't touch it option (.e.g. Never)" that does what it does today (and that should be the default, otherwise we end up causing clang-format to change ALL java code" which could be 100's of millions of lines+
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Format/Format.cpp:906
LLVMStyle.JavaScriptWrapImports = true;
+ LLVMStyle.JavaStaticImportAfterImport = false;
LLVMStyle.TabWidth = 8;
----------------
We can't have a default that does will cause a change
================
Comment at: clang/unittests/Format/SortImportsTestJava.cpp:253
+TEST_F(SortImportsTestJava, FormatJavaStaticImportAfterImport) {
+ FmtStyle.JavaStaticImportAfterImport = true;
----------------
please test all options
You are also missing a test for checking the PARSING of the options
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D87201/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D87201
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list