[PATCH] D86736: [analyzer][NFC] Don't bind values to ObjCForCollectionStmt, replace it with a GDM trait

Gabor Marton via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Aug 28 06:07:57 PDT 2020


martong added a comment.

> For any other loops, in order to know whether we should analyze another iteration, among other things, we evaluate it's condition. Which is a problem for ObjCForCollectionStmt, because it simply doesn't have one

Shouldn't we try to fix the ObjCForCollectionStmt in the AST rather? By adding the condition to that as a (sub)expression? There are already many discrepancies and inconsistencies between supposedly similar AST nodes, and people do fix them occasionally (e.g. D81787 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D81787>).
To be honest, it seems a bit off to store some parts of the liveness info in the GDM while other parts not in the GDM ...


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D86736/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D86736



More information about the cfe-commits mailing list