[PATCH] D86465: [analyzer][solver] Redesign constraint ranges data structure
Gabor Marton via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Aug 26 04:54:25 PDT 2020
martong added a comment.
In D86465#2238379 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D86465#2238379>, @vsavchenko wrote:
> Here are some benchmarking results.
> In docker:
> F12777445: tiny.png <https://reviews.llvm.org/F12777445>
> F12777444: small.png <https://reviews.llvm.org/F12777444>
> Natively on my Mac (no memory measurements due to this issue <https://github.com/giampaolo/psutil/issues/1791> during `psutil` installation):
> F12777471: tiny-native.png <https://reviews.llvm.org/F12777471>
> F12777472: small-native.png <https://reviews.llvm.org/F12777472>
These are really promising figures, nice work! (And the measurement stuff itself is also a great addition, thanks for that!)
Not that it would matter much, but I was just wondering why there is a slightly bigger memory usage in some of the `docker/small` projects? The most conspicuous is `oatpp`.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D86465/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D86465
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list