[PATCH] D85984: [analyzer] Add a new checker alpha.cplusplus.CPlusPlus11Lock

[Artem Dergachev via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

NoQ added a comment.

No-no, recursive locks are much more complicated than that, please do them separately. You'll have to discriminate between a real double lock / double unlock bug and an actual valid use of the recursive mutex in order to emit any warnings at all. That's completely different checker logic.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D85984/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D85984