[PATCH] D85984: [analyzer] Add a new checker alpha.cplusplus.CPlusPlus11Lock
Artem Dergachev via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Aug 25 13:45:19 PDT 2020
NoQ added a comment.
No-no, recursive locks are much more complicated than that, please do them separately. You'll have to discriminate between a real double lock / double unlock bug and an actual valid use of the recursive mutex in order to emit any warnings at all. That's completely different checker logic.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D85984/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D85984
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list