[clang] 975467e - [Diagnostics] Handle string concat pattern and avoid false positives
Dávid Bolvanský via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Sun Aug 9 09:03:09 PDT 2020
We warn if it is just one occurance and next literal is not split too. I changed test to test other scenario. I could add that test back, but I think we have enough tests to cover code.
We should not warn for code pattern:
{
“a” “b”,
“c” “d”
}
> Dňa 9. 8. 2020 o 17:49 užívateľ Arthur O'Dwyer <arthur.j.odwyer at gmail.com> napísal:
>
>
> Hi Dávid,
> Does this part of the patch imply that we don't want to warn on
> "foo" TWO
> ? and if so, why not?
> Anyway, I think at least
> "foo" TWO
> should be kept in the test suite, as a test-for-absence-of-warning.
>
> TWO "bar",
> - "foo" TWO // expected-note{{place parentheses around the string literal to silence warning}}
> + "foo" "bar" TWO // expected-note{{place parentheses around the string literal to silence warning}}
>
> my $.02,
> Arthur
>
>> On Sun, Aug 9, 2020 at 10:03 AM Dávid Bolvanský via cfe-commits <cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Author: Dávid Bolvanský
>> Date: 2020-08-09T16:02:41+02:00
>> New Revision: 975467e4aa7ce1b8fcf4af0e25cdf053cfa8669e
>>
>> URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/975467e4aa7ce1b8fcf4af0e25cdf053cfa8669e
>> DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/975467e4aa7ce1b8fcf4af0e25cdf053cfa8669e.diff
>>
>> LOG: [Diagnostics] Handle string concat pattern and avoid false positives
>>
>> Added:
>>
>>
>> Modified:
>> clang/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
>> clang/test/Sema/string-concat.c
>>
>> Removed:
>>
>>
>>
>> ################################################################################
>> diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
>> index 35047a7b2b14..74427f8cd7ae 100644
>> --- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
>> +++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaExpr.cpp
>> @@ -6908,10 +6908,13 @@ Sema::ActOnInitList(SourceLocation LBraceLoc, MultiExprArg InitArgList,
>> << InitArgList[I]->getSourceRange();
>> } else if (const auto *SL = dyn_cast<StringLiteral>(InitArgList[I])) {
>> unsigned NumConcat = SL->getNumConcatenated();
>> + const auto *SLNext =
>> + dyn_cast<StringLiteral>(InitArgList[I + 1 < E ? I + 1 : 0]);
>> // Diagnose missing comma in string array initialization.
>> - // Do not warn when all the elements in the initializer are concatenated together.
>> - // Do not warn for macros too.
>> - if (NumConcat > 1 && E > 2 && !SL->getBeginLoc().isMacroID()) {
>> + // Do not warn when all the elements in the initializer are concatenated
>> + // together. Do not warn for macros too.
>> + if (NumConcat > 1 && E > 2 && !SL->getBeginLoc().isMacroID() && SLNext &&
>> + NumConcat != SLNext->getNumConcatenated()) {
>> SmallVector<FixItHint, 1> Hints;
>> for (unsigned i = 0; i < NumConcat - 1; ++i)
>> Hints.push_back(FixItHint::CreateInsertion(
>>
>> diff --git a/clang/test/Sema/string-concat.c b/clang/test/Sema/string-concat.c
>> index c93bbd4eaa00..13e9656d2536 100644
>> --- a/clang/test/Sema/string-concat.c
>> +++ b/clang/test/Sema/string-concat.c
>> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ char missing_comma_inner[][5] = {
>> #define TWO "foo"
>> const char *macro_test[] = { ONE("foo") "bar",
>> TWO "bar",
>> - "foo" TWO // expected-note{{place parentheses around the string literal to silence warning}}
>> + "foo" "bar" TWO // expected-note{{place parentheses around the string literal to silence warning}}
>> }; // expected-warning at -1{{suspicious concatenation of string literals in an array initialization; did you mean to separate the elements with a comma?}}
>>
>> // Do not warn for macros.
>> @@ -104,6 +104,12 @@ const char *not_warn[] = {
>> "world", "test"
>> };
>>
>> +const char *not_warn2[] = {
>> + "// Aaa\\\n" " Bbb\\ \n" " Ccc?" "?/\n",
>> + "// Aaa\\\r\n" " Bbb\\ \r\n" " Ccc?" "?/\r\n",
>> + "// Aaa\\\r" " Bbb\\ \r" " Ccc?" "?/\r"
>> + };
>> +
>> // Do not warn when all the elements in the initializer are concatenated together.
>> const char *all_elems_in_init_concatenated[] = {"a" "b" "c"};
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20200809/89484dd8/attachment.html>
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list