[PATCH] D84192: [OpenMP5.0] map item can be non-contiguous for target update
Alexey Bataev via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jul 21 15:09:52 PDT 2020
ABataev added a comment.
In D84192#2165396 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D84192#2165396>, @cchen wrote:
> In D84192#2165249 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D84192#2165249>, @ABataev wrote:
>
> > In D84192#2165235 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D84192#2165235>, @cchen wrote:
> >
> > > In D84192#2164885 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D84192#2164885>, @ABataev wrote:
> > >
> > > > Also, what about compatibility with declare mapper? Can you add tests for it?
> > >
> > >
> > > There's a restriction for map clause that non-contiguous is not allowed and I guess it also applies to declare mapper.
> >
> >
> > I see that to/from clauses allow to use mappers too:
> >
> > to([mapper(mapper-identifier):]locator-list) from([mapper(mapper-identifier):]locator-list
> >
>
>
> I'm confused of how to use to([mapper(mapper-identifier):]locator-list) with array section.
> For this case:
>
> class C {
> public:
> int a;
> double b[3][4][5];
> };
>
> #pragma omp declare mapper(id: C s) map(s.a, s.b[0:3][0:4][0:5])
>
> #pragma omp target update from(mapper(id): c)
>
>
> Clang already has a semantic check in from clause when mapper is used: "mapper type must be of struct, union or class type".
> So the only item I can put in from clause in the above example is `c` and I cannot put c.b[0:2][1:2][0:2] or any even c.b[0:2].
Does clang compile your example? If not, shall it be allowed for to/from clauses or not?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D84192/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D84192
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list