[PATCH] D83013: [LPM] Port CGProfilePass from NPM to LPM
Zequan Wu via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Jul 7 10:01:33 PDT 2020
zequanwu marked an inline comment as done.
zequanwu added inline comments.
================
Comment at: llvm/test/Other/opt-O2-pipeline.ll:289
+; CHECK-NEXT: Branch Probability Analysis
+; CHECK-NEXT: Block Frequency Analysis
; CHECK-NEXT: FunctionPass Manager
----------------
nikic wrote:
> hans wrote:
> > nikic wrote:
> > > Is it possible to switch this pass to use LazyBPI / LazyBFA, only fetched if PGO is actually in use?
> > >
> > > PGO functionality that most people don't use adding expensive analysis passes like PDT should be avoided.
> > I wonder if just switching to LazyBlockFrequencyInfo would help though. It looks to me like the CGProfile would request info about each function anyway.
> >
> > I was surprised to see that Clang sets Opts.CallGraphProfile solely based on whether the integrated assembler is used. Maybe a better fix is to only set that to true when a profile is actually being used?
> > I wonder if just switching to LazyBlockFrequencyInfo would help though. It looks to me like the CGProfile would request info about each function anyway.
>
> It would only help if there is some way to only fetch the analysis conditionally. I believe many PGO passes use something like PSI.hasProfileSummary() or F.hasProfileData() for that.
>
> > I was surprised to see that Clang sets Opts.CallGraphProfile solely based on whether the integrated assembler is used. Maybe a better fix is to only set that to true when a profile is actually being used?
>
> Right, just disabling this by default in clang/opt would also work.
>
> For reference, the current compile-time numbers for this patch: https://llvm-compile-time-tracker.com/compare.php?from=516ff1d4baee28b1911737e47b42973567adf8ff&to=8df840660bb764b6653fcfd9ac7a72cc6adebde6&stat=instructions Not huge, but it adds up (some similar regressions have been introduced in LLVM 10).
Do you mean disabling it just for LPM or both?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D83013/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D83013
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list