[PATCH] D79244: [Sema] Put existing warning under -Wexcess-initializers

Eli Friedman via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon May 4 16:11:15 PDT 2020

Previous message: [PATCH] D78659: Add nomerge function attribute to supress tail merge optimization in simplifyCFG
Next message: [PATCH] D79244: [Sema] Put existing warning under -Wexcess-initializers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

efriedma added a comment.

Should we stick ext_excess_initializers_in_char_array_initializer and ext_initializer_string_for_char_array_too_long in the same warning group?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D79244/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D79244

Previous message: [PATCH] D78659: Add nomerge function attribute to supress tail merge optimization in simplifyCFG
Next message: [PATCH] D79244: [Sema] Put existing warning under -Wexcess-initializers
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the cfe-commits mailing list