[PATCH] D79293: [clang-format] [PR45218] Fix an issue where < and > and >> in a for loop gets incorrectly interpreted at a TemplateOpener/Closer

[MyDeveloperDay via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

MyDeveloperDay updated this revision to Diff 261656.
MyDeveloperDay added a comment.

Update for pre-merge checks


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D79293/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D79293

Files:
  clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp
  clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp


Index: clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
+++ clang/unittests/Format/FormatTest.cpp
@@ -7065,6 +7065,8 @@
   verifyFormat("static_assert(is_convertible<A &&, B>::value, \"AAA\");");
   verifyFormat("Constructor(A... a) : a_(X<A>{std::forward<A>(a)}...) {}");
   verifyFormat("< < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < < <");
+
+  verifyFormat("for (unsigned i = 0; i < i; ++i, v = v >> 1)");
 }
 
 TEST_F(FormatTest, BitshiftOperatorWidth) {
Index: clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp
===================================================================
--- clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp
+++ clang/lib/Format/TokenAnnotator.cpp
@@ -145,6 +145,10 @@
           Contexts[Contexts.size() - 2].IsExpression &&
           !Line.startsWith(tok::kw_template))
         return false;
+      // If we see a ; then likely this is a for loop and not the template
+      if (CurrentToken->is(tok::semi))
+        return false;
+
       updateParameterCount(Left, CurrentToken);
       if (Style.Language == FormatStyle::LK_Proto) {
         if (FormatToken *Previous = CurrentToken->getPreviousNonComment()) {


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D79293.261656.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 1230 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20200502/0e21085f/attachment.bin>