[PATCH] D79204: [clang-format] NFC - clang-format the FormatTests

[MyDeveloperDay via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

MyDeveloperDay created this revision.
MyDeveloperDay added reviewers: krasimir, mitchell-stellar, sammccall.
MyDeveloperDay added projects: clang, clang-format.

Ensure the clang-format unit tests are themselves clang-formatted

Having areas of the llvm code which are clang-format clean, give us more areas to run new clang-format binaries on ensuring we haven't broken anything.

It seems to me we SHOULD have this clang-formatted at a minimum, otherwise how can we expect others to use clang-format if we "don't eat our own dogfood", also if the tests are dependent on the formatting of the code then that would also be bad!


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

https://reviews.llvm.org/D79204

Files:
  clang/unittests/Format/CleanupTest.cpp
  clang/unittests/Format/FormatTestCSharp.cpp
  clang/unittests/Format/FormatTestComments.cpp
  clang/unittests/Format/FormatTestJS.cpp
  clang/unittests/Format/FormatTestJava.cpp
  clang/unittests/Format/FormatTestObjC.cpp
  clang/unittests/Format/FormatTestProto.cpp
  clang/unittests/Format/FormatTestRawStrings.cpp
  clang/unittests/Format/FormatTestSelective.cpp
  clang/unittests/Format/FormatTestTextProto.cpp
  clang/unittests/Format/NamespaceEndCommentsFixerTest.cpp
  clang/unittests/Format/SortIncludesTest.cpp
  clang/unittests/Format/UsingDeclarationsSorterTest.cpp

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: D79204.261345.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 44108 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-commits/attachments/20200430/933c8a85/attachment-0001.bin>