[PATCH] D63279: [Analyzer] Unroll for-loops where the upper boundary is a variable with know value

Kristóf Umann via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Mar 27 05:56:31 PDT 2020


Szelethus added a comment.

In D63279#1939435 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D63279#1939435>, @xazax.hun wrote:

> In D63279#1939349 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D63279#1939349>, @Szelethus wrote:
>
> > (note: I forgot to submit this a couple weeks ago)
> >
> > LLVM is crashing on me due to the issue mentioned in D75678 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D75678>, but on Bitcoin, Xerces, CppCheck and Rtags I observed no difference in between the 2 runs. I recall that others mentioned that @szepet used to run his analyses with other configurations. I'll read final report and take another look later.
> >
> > http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-August/055259.html
>
>
> You mean no difference in the reports? It is very unlikely to get lucky and gain/loose reports. Peter used to check the statistics emitted by the analyzer such as basic block coverage.


I'll be honest, I don't see myself redoing his evaluation anytime soon -- since its not crashing, I guess we could just enable it?


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D63279/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D63279





More information about the cfe-commits mailing list