[PATCH] D69585: PerformPendingInstatiations() already in the PCH

Luboš Luňák via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Mar 26 03:12:51 PDT 2020


llunak added a comment.

In D69585#1942431 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D69585#1942431>, @rsmith wrote:

> This needs to be done behind a flag. It's an explicit design goal that compilation behavior using a PCH or precompiled preamble behaves identically to compilation not using a PCH / precompiled preamble. The behavior of this patch is also non-conforming: we're only allowed to perform function template instantiations at their points of instantiation (essentially, at points of use + at the end of the translation unit).


How is that different from -fmodules? Given that AFAICT this makes PCHs work the same way as modules, this should mean -fmodules also both fails the identical behaviour goal and is non-conforming.

And to make sure I understand correctly, by behaving identically you mean that all the compiler output should be identical without even benign differences?


Repository:
  rC Clang

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D69585/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D69585





More information about the cfe-commits mailing list