[PATCH] D73898: [analyzer] StdLibraryFunctionsChecker: Add argument constraints

Kristóf Umann via Phabricator via cfe-commits cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Thu Mar 19 13:09:22 PDT 2020


Szelethus accepted this revision.
Szelethus added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.

Whoo! The patch looks great and well thought out, the tests look like they cover everything and we also talked about plans for future patches. Excellent!

I left a nit about merging the test files, but I'll leave it up to you to address or ignore it.



================
Comment at: clang/test/Analysis/std-c-library-functions-arg-constraints.c:1-7
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 %s \
+// RUN:   -analyzer-checker=core \
+// RUN:   -analyzer-checker=apiModeling.StdCLibraryFunctions \
+// RUN:   -analyzer-checker=apiModeling.StdCLibraryFunctionArgs \
+// RUN:   -analyzer-checker=debug.ExprInspection \
+// RUN:   -triple x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu \
+// RUN:   -verify
----------------
martong wrote:
> Szelethus wrote:
> > Hmm, why do we have 2 different test files that essentially do the same? Shouldn't we only have a single one with `analyzer-output=text`?
> No, I wanted to have two different test files to test two different things: (1) We do have the constraints applied (here we don't care about the warnings and the path)
> (2) Check that we have a warning with the proper tracking and notes.
What if we had different `-verify`s? `clang/test/Analysis/track-conditions.cpp` is a great example.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D73898/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D73898





More information about the cfe-commits mailing list