[PATCH] D74541: [Analyzer] Use note tags to track iterator increments and decrements

[Balogh, Ádám via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

baloghadamsoftware marked 4 inline comments as done.
baloghadamsoftware added inline comments.


================
Comment at: clang/lib/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/IteratorModeling.cpp:519-520
+const NoteTag *IteratorModeling::getChangeTag(CheckerContext &C, StringRef Text,
+                                              const Expr *ItE, SVal It1,
+                                              int64_t Amount, SVal It2) const {
+  StringRef Name;
----------------
Szelethus wrote:
> Szelethus wrote:
> > Are `It1` and `It2` used? Why do we default the latter to `UndefinedVal`?
> Ah, okay, we use it in a followup patch. Still, we shouldn't use `UndefinedVal`, as discussed in D75514.
I completely removed them from this patch.


CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D74541/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D74541