[PATCH] D72841: [RFC] Add support for pragma float_control, to control precision and exception behavior at the source level

[John McCall via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

rjmccall added a comment.

In D72841#1917459 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D72841#1917459>, @rjmccall wrote:

> In D72841#1917340 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D72841#1917340>, @mibintc wrote:
>
> > @rjmccall Since CompoundAssignmentOperator derives from BinaryOperator, it's not simple to add Trailing storage here.  I think I will have to fold CompoundAssignmentOperator into BinaryOperator and then add the 2 extra fields needed by CompoundAssignmentOperator into Trailing storage.  Can you think of a better way?  I worked on Trailing storage for UnaryOperator first and that wasn't too bad, but Binary is a different story.
>
>
> It's something we deal with occasionally, but it's definitely annoying.  You basically have to test for which concrete class you have and then ask that class for its trailing storage.
>
> Collapsing the types might be okay but could get involved.


To be clear, we do this in the Clang AST by doing a lot of hand-rolled trailing storage rather than by using llvm::TrailingStorage.  If you're willing to do the refactors necessary to use the latter, though, that's great; but as mentioned, you'll need to either collapse CompoundAssignmentOperator into BinaryOperator or introduce a concrete subclass for the non-compound operators and make BinaryOperator an abstract node.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D72841/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D72841