[PATCH] D75332: [clang-tidy] Add module for llvm-libc and restrict-system-libc-header-check.
Fangrui Song via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Mar 3 10:56:26 PST 2020
MaskRay added a comment.
> `RestrictSystemLibcHeadersCheck`
As I commented previously, I think the checker name should be generalized, as it does not need to be coupled with llvm-libc. Other projects may have similar needs. For example, they don't want to accidentally include a system zlib.h -> they may ship a bundled zlib (say, in third_party/zlib/).
Maybe `misc/` (or `portability/`) is more suitable?
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/llvmlibc/RestrictSystemLibcHeadersCheck.cpp:49
+ if (SrcMgr::isSystem(FileType)) {
+ // Compiler provided headers are allowed (e.g stddef.h).
+ if (SearchPath == CompilerIncudeDir) {
----------------
This is actually an interesting topic.
On FreeBSD and linux-musl, stdalign.h stdarg.h stdbool.h stddef.h stdint.h stdnoreturn.h are provided by libc instead.
After D65699,
```
% clang -fsyntax-only -target x86_64-linux-musl -v /tmp/c/a.c
...
#include "..." search starts here:
#include <...> search starts here:
/usr/local/include
/usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu
/usr/include
/tmp/ReleaseA/lib/clang/11.0.0/include
End of search list.
```
Note that the $resource_dir/include is after libc search directories on a Linux glibc (x86_64-linux-gnu) system.
Using a compiler intrinsic file (e.g. `x86intrin.h`) may be less controversial. It leaves to llvm-libc to decide which ordering is better. (I lean toward FreeBSD/linux musl way.)
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clang-tidy/llvmlibc/RestrictSystemLibcHeadersCheck.cpp:52
+ return;
+ }
+ if (!SM.isInMainFile(HashLoc)) {
----------------
Drop excess parentheses.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D75332/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D75332
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list