[clang] 1f3f8c3 - PR44721: Don't consider overloaded operators for built-in comparisons
Hans Wennborg via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Mon Feb 3 04:53:35 PST 2020
Yes, go ahead.
On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 2:19 AM Richard Smith <richard at metafoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Hi Hans,
>
> This is a pretty safe bugfix for a new feature in Clang 10. OK for branch?
>
> On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 17:17, Richard Smith via cfe-commits <cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Author: Richard Smith
>> Date: 2020-01-30T17:16:50-08:00
>> New Revision: 1f3f8c369a5067a132c871f33a955a7feaea8534
>>
>> URL: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1f3f8c369a5067a132c871f33a955a7feaea8534
>> DIFF: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1f3f8c369a5067a132c871f33a955a7feaea8534.diff
>>
>> LOG: PR44721: Don't consider overloaded operators for built-in comparisons
>> when building a defaulted comparison.
>>
>> As a convenient way of asking whether `x @ y` is valid and building it,
>> we previouly always performed overload resolution and built an
>> overloaded expression, which would both end up picking a builtin
>> operator candidate when given a non-overloadable type. But that's not
>> quite right, because it can result in our finding a user-declared
>> operator overload, which we should never do when applying operators
>> non-overloadable types.
>>
>> Handle this more correctly: skip overload resolution when building
>> `x @ y` if the operands are not overloadable. But still perform overload
>> resolution (considering only builtin candidates) when checking validity,
>> as we don't have any other good way to ask whether a binary operator
>> expression would be valid.
>>
>> Added:
>>
>>
>> Modified:
>> clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
>> clang/test/CXX/class/class.compare/class.compare.default/p3.cpp
>>
>> Removed:
>>
>>
>>
>> ################################################################################
>> diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
>> index 814a3c64eeba..65526e4020cf 100644
>> --- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
>> +++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
>> @@ -7373,7 +7373,14 @@ class DefaultedComparisonAnalyzer
>> /// resolution [...]
>> CandidateSet.exclude(FD);
>>
>> - S.LookupOverloadedBinOp(CandidateSet, OO, Fns, Args);
>> + if (Args[0]->getType()->isOverloadableType())
>> + S.LookupOverloadedBinOp(CandidateSet, OO, Fns, Args);
>> + else {
>> + // FIXME: We determine whether this is a valid expression by checking to
>> + // see if there's a viable builtin operator candidate for it. That isn't
>> + // really what the rules ask us to do, but should give the right results.
>> + S.AddBuiltinOperatorCandidates(OO, FD->getLocation(), Args, CandidateSet);
>> + }
>>
>> Result R;
>>
>> @@ -7826,10 +7833,14 @@ class DefaultedComparisonSynthesizer
>> return StmtError();
>>
>> OverloadedOperatorKind OO = FD->getOverloadedOperator();
>> - ExprResult Op = S.CreateOverloadedBinOp(
>> - Loc, BinaryOperator::getOverloadedOpcode(OO), Fns,
>> - Obj.first.get(), Obj.second.get(), /*PerformADL=*/true,
>> - /*AllowRewrittenCandidates=*/true, FD);
>> + BinaryOperatorKind Opc = BinaryOperator::getOverloadedOpcode(OO);
>> + ExprResult Op;
>> + if (Type->isOverloadableType())
>> + Op = S.CreateOverloadedBinOp(Loc, Opc, Fns, Obj.first.get(),
>> + Obj.second.get(), /*PerformADL=*/true,
>> + /*AllowRewrittenCandidates=*/true, FD);
>> + else
>> + Op = S.CreateBuiltinBinOp(Loc, Opc, Obj.first.get(), Obj.second.get());
>> if (Op.isInvalid())
>> return StmtError();
>>
>> @@ -7869,8 +7880,12 @@ class DefaultedComparisonSynthesizer
>> llvm::APInt ZeroVal(S.Context.getIntWidth(S.Context.IntTy), 0);
>> Expr *Zero =
>> IntegerLiteral::Create(S.Context, ZeroVal, S.Context.IntTy, Loc);
>> - ExprResult Comp = S.CreateOverloadedBinOp(Loc, BO_NE, Fns, VDRef.get(),
>> - Zero, true, true, FD);
>> + ExprResult Comp;
>> + if (VDRef.get()->getType()->isOverloadableType())
>> + Comp = S.CreateOverloadedBinOp(Loc, BO_NE, Fns, VDRef.get(), Zero, true,
>> + true, FD);
>> + else
>> + Comp = S.CreateBuiltinBinOp(Loc, BO_NE, VDRef.get(), Zero);
>> if (Comp.isInvalid())
>> return StmtError();
>> Sema::ConditionResult Cond = S.ActOnCondition(
>>
>> diff --git a/clang/test/CXX/class/class.compare/class.compare.default/p3.cpp b/clang/test/CXX/class/class.compare/class.compare.default/p3.cpp
>> index 3d0ab2c5bde6..81a48a393a06 100644
>> --- a/clang/test/CXX/class/class.compare/class.compare.default/p3.cpp
>> +++ b/clang/test/CXX/class/class.compare/class.compare.default/p3.cpp
>> @@ -190,3 +190,15 @@ bool operator<(const G&, const G&);
>> bool operator<=(const G&, const G&);
>> bool operator>(const G&, const G&);
>> bool operator>=(const G&, const G&);
>> +
>> +namespace PR44721 {
>> + template <typename T> bool operator==(T const &, T const &) { return true; }
>> + template <typename T, typename U> bool operator!=(T const &, U const &) { return true; }
>> + template <typename T> int operator<=>(T const &, T const &) { return 0; }
>> +
>> + struct S {
>> + friend bool operator==(const S &, const S &) = default;
>> + friend bool operator<=>(const S &, const S &) = default;
>> + int x;
>> + };
>> +}
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cfe-commits mailing list
>> cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
>> https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list