[PATCH] D73610: [clangd] Replace raw lexer code with token buffer in prepare rename.
Sam McCall via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Wed Jan 29 02:15:52 PST 2020
sammccall added a comment.
Nice, thanks!
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/ClangdServer.cpp:322
+ if (!TouchingIdentifier)
+ return CB(llvm::None); // no rename on non-identifiers.
+
----------------
Agree that this behavior is OK per the spec, but do we actually prefer it/why the change?
Seems like clients are marginally more likely to handle null incorrectly/silently, and we give up control over the message.
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/ClangdServer.cpp:324
+
+ auto Range = getTokenRange(AST.getSourceManager(), AST.getLangOpts(),
+ TouchingIdentifier->location());
----------------
this runs the lexer to compute token boundaries. We actually already have them: syntax::Token has endLocation/length
================
Comment at: clang-tools-extra/clangd/SourceCode.h:302
+/// Returns the identifier token that touches the given \p Pos
+/// Redturns nullptr if there is none.
----------------
I don't think this function improves things vs keeping it inline:
- wrapping clang functions to adapt them to our data types doesn't seem sustainable
- it's hard to draw the line, but this one neither hides logic (saves 2 trivial lines) nor is very commonly used (yet)
- this breaks a (minor) error-handling path: an invalid range is no longer reported to the client as an error
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D73610/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D73610
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list