[PATCH] D73380: [clang] Annotating C++'s `operator new` with more attributes
Richard Smith - zygoloid via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jan 24 19:09:49 PST 2020
rsmith added inline comments.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:14361
+/// attributes are applied to declarations.
+void Sema::AddKnownFunctionAttributesForReplaceableGlobalAllocationFunction(
+ FunctionDecl *FD) {
----------------
This should all be done by CodeGen, not by injecting source-level attributes.
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:14414-14432
+ // C++2a [basic.stc.dynamic.allocation]p3:
+ // For an allocation function [...], the pointer returned on a successful
+ // call shall represent the address of storage that is aligned as follows:
+ // (3.2),(3.3) Otherwise, [...] the storage is aligned for any object
+ // that does not have new-extended alignment [...].
+ //
+ // NOTE: we intentionally always manifest this basic alignment, because it is
----------------
This is incorrect. The pointer returned by `operator new` is only suitably aligned for any object that does not have new-extended alignment **and is of the requested size**. And the pointer returned by `operator new[]` is suitably aligned for any object **that is no larger than the requested size**. (These are both different from the rule for `malloc`, which does behave as you're suggesting here.) For example:
Suppose the default new alignment and the largest fundamental alignment are both 16, and we try to allocate 12 bytes. Then:
* `operator new` need only return storage that is 4-byte aligned (because that is the largest alignment that can be required by a type `T` with `sizeof(T) == 12`)
* `operator new` need only return storage that is 8-byte aligned (because that is the largest alignment that can be required by a type `T` with `sizeof(T) <= 12`)
* `malloc` must return storage that is 16-byte aligned (because that is the largest fundamental alignment)
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D73380/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D73380
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list