[PATCH] D70568: [Support] Possibly use exception handler in the Crash Recovery Context in the same way as global exceptions
Alexandre Ganea via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Jan 10 08:15:22 PST 2020
aganea marked an inline comment as done.
aganea added a comment.
Thanks for taking the time @hans!
================
Comment at: llvm/unittests/Support/CrashRecoveryTest.cpp:72
+ sys::RemoveFileOnSignal(Filename);
+ llvm::sys::AddSignalHandler(incrementGlobalWithCookie, nullptr);
+ GlobalInt = 0;
----------------
hans wrote:
> Is there a purpose to passing the pointer her, or could it just use incrementGlobal? If we can't, maybe call it WithPointer or something instead (or use an overload) - I was confused by the Cookie part until I realize you just mean it takes some argument.
The cookie thing is because:
```
using SignalHandlerCallback = void (*)(void *);
/// Add a function to be called when an abort/kill signal is delivered to the
/// process. The handler can have a cookie passed to it to identify what
/// instance of the handler it is.
void AddSignalHandler(SignalHandlerCallback FnPtr, void *Cookie);
```
Sure, I'll change it to an overload.
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D70568/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D70568
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list