[PATCH] D50119: P1144 "Trivially relocatable" (0/3): Compiler support for `__is_trivially_relocatable(T)`

[Arthur O'Dwyer via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

Quuxplusone added a comment.

@rjmccall ping? any further thoughts on `[[maybe_trivially_relocatable]]`, in light of the followup libc++ patches? (Those patches do not use `[[maybe_trivially_relocatable]]`, although that may just be because I wrote them.)

How could one go about getting this patch into Clang?

Also, for those who haven't seen it, I gave a full-length talk on "trivially relocatable" at C++Now 2019: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SGdfPextuAU  The talk compares my fully implemented Clang/libc++ solution https://wg21.link/p1144 to other practical solutions such as Folly, BSL, and EASTL, and to other paper solutions such as https://wg21.link/n4158 and https://wg21.link/p1029.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D50119/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D50119