[PATCH] D71963: clang-tidy doc: Add the severities description

[Kim Viggedal via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

vingeldal added a comment.

In D71963#1799956 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D71963#1799956>, @aaron.ballman wrote:

> I may have missed this in prior discussions, and if so, I'm sorry -- but why are we taking CodeChecker as the model for this? I'm not opposed to having some notion of severity for our checks (basically every tool and many coding standards have the same concept), but I am not certain why we would say CodeChecker's way is the way we want clang-tidy to progress. Also, does this tie in with the clang static analyzer checks, or is the severity stuff only for clang-tidy?


Same thoughts here. In my opinion it would be preferable if Clang tidy doesn't make any promises about being aligned with CodeChecker severity levels.


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D71963/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D71963