[PATCH] D36051: [clang-tidy] List the checkers with autofix

[Sylvestre Ledru via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

sylvestre.ledru added a comment.

In D36051#1792909 <https://reviews.llvm.org/D36051#1792909>, @whisperity wrote:

> I am a little bit conflicted about the //Severity// column. While I know our people put a great deal of effort into keeping this classification sane, what was put into CodeChecker is, at the end of the day, a pretty arbitrary classification.


Sure, static analysis is often subjective... Coverity has some classification too. From my experience, the one from code checker matches pretty well.

> I think RSTs support comments, right? Maybe it should be indicated in the code (as a comment only) where the severity was taken from, so if someone comes up with a reason to change a checker's severity, they could also submit a patch to CodeChecker's knowledge-base.

Added, thanks for the idea!


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D36051/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D36051