[PATCH] D36051: [clang-tidy] List the checkers with autofix

[Whisperity via Phabricator via cfe-commits]

whisperity added a comment.

I am a little bit conflicted about the //Severity// column. While I know our people put a great deal of effort into keeping this classification sane, what was put into CodeChecker is, at the end of the day, a pretty arbitrary classification.

I think RSTs support comments, right? Maybe it should be indicated in the code (as a comment only) where the severity was taken from, so if someone comes up with a reason to change a checker's severity, they could also submit a patch to CodeChecker's knowledge-base.

Maybe not //just// in the code comment, but also in the markup that gets rendered for the users, too?


Repository:
  rG LLVM Github Monorepo

CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
  https://reviews.llvm.org/D36051/new/

https://reviews.llvm.org/D36051