[PATCH] D71475: [WIP][OPENMP] Try to fix linear clause crash by emitting alloca for step
Alexey Bataev via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Tue Dec 17 07:28:35 PST 2019
ABataev added a comment.
Here is more proper fix. We don't need to capture just `k` here, instead, we need to capture the whole expression.
Linear clause has a little bit different processing rather than all other clauses caused by a non-perfect design. Add codegen tests for all combined constructs that may require capturing of the linear step expression. Probably, some additional work in codegen may be required.
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp
index afe0f1a..cb55ace 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp
@@ -3830,6 +3830,9 @@ StmtResult Sema::ActOnOpenMPRegionEnd(StmtResult S,
MarkDeclarationsReferencedInExpr(E);
}
}
+ if (auto *LC = dyn_cast<OMPLinearClause>(Clause))
+ if (Expr *E = LC->getStep())
+ MarkDeclarationsReferencedInExpr(E);
DSAStack->setForceVarCapturing(/*V=*/false);
} else if (CaptureRegions.size() > 1 ||
CaptureRegions.back() != OMPD_unknown) {
@@ -11396,12 +11399,87 @@ static OpenMPDirectiveKind getOpenMPCaptureRegionForClause(
llvm_unreachable("Unknown OpenMP directive");
}
break;
+ case OMPC_linear:
+ switch (DKind) {
+ case OMPD_taskloop_simd:
+ case OMPD_master_taskloop_simd:
+ case OMPD_parallel_master_taskloop_simd:
+ CaptureRegion = OMPD_taskloop;
+ break;
+ case OMPD_target_simd:
+ CaptureRegion = OMPD_target;
+ break;
+ case OMPD_target_teams_distribute_simd:
+ case OMPD_teams_distribute_simd:
+ CaptureRegion = OMPD_teams;
+ break;
+ case OMPD_target_parallel_for:
+ case OMPD_target_parallel_for_simd:
+ case OMPD_target_teams_distribute_parallel_for:
+ case OMPD_target_teams_distribute_parallel_for_simd:
+ case OMPD_teams_distribute_parallel_for:
+ case OMPD_teams_distribute_parallel_for_simd:
+ case OMPD_distribute_parallel_for:
+ case OMPD_distribute_parallel_for_simd:
+ case OMPD_parallel_for:
+ case OMPD_parallel_for_simd:
+ CaptureRegion = OMPD_parallel;
+ break;
+ case OMPD_parallel_master_taskloop:
+ case OMPD_task:
+ case OMPD_taskloop:
+ case OMPD_master_taskloop:
+ case OMPD_target_update:
+ case OMPD_target_enter_data:
+ case OMPD_target_exit_data:
+ case OMPD_target:
+ case OMPD_target_teams:
+ case OMPD_target_parallel:
+ case OMPD_target_teams_distribute:
+ case OMPD_target_data:
+ case OMPD_teams:
+ case OMPD_teams_distribute:
+ case OMPD_cancel:
+ case OMPD_parallel:
+ case OMPD_parallel_master:
+ case OMPD_parallel_sections:
+ case OMPD_threadprivate:
+ case OMPD_allocate:
+ case OMPD_taskyield:
+ case OMPD_barrier:
+ case OMPD_taskwait:
+ case OMPD_cancellation_point:
+ case OMPD_flush:
+ case OMPD_declare_reduction:
+ case OMPD_declare_mapper:
+ case OMPD_declare_simd:
+ case OMPD_declare_variant:
+ case OMPD_declare_target:
+ case OMPD_end_declare_target:
+ case OMPD_simd:
+ case OMPD_for:
+ case OMPD_for_simd:
+ case OMPD_sections:
+ case OMPD_section:
+ case OMPD_single:
+ case OMPD_master:
+ case OMPD_critical:
+ case OMPD_taskgroup:
+ case OMPD_distribute:
+ case OMPD_ordered:
+ case OMPD_atomic:
+ case OMPD_distribute_simd:
+ case OMPD_requires:
+ llvm_unreachable("Unexpected OpenMP directive with linear-clause");
+ case OMPD_unknown:
+ llvm_unreachable("Unknown OpenMP directive");
+ }
+ break;
case OMPC_firstprivate:
case OMPC_lastprivate:
case OMPC_reduction:
case OMPC_task_reduction:
case OMPC_in_reduction:
- case OMPC_linear:
case OMPC_default:
case OMPC_proc_bind:
case OMPC_safelen:
@@ -14377,6 +14455,16 @@ OMPClause *Sema::ActOnOpenMPLinearClause(
if (Val.isInvalid())
return nullptr;
StepExpr = Val.get();
+ OpenMPDirectiveKind DKind = DSAStack->getCurrentDirective();
+ OpenMPDirectiveKind CaptureRegion =
+ getOpenMPCaptureRegionForClause(DKind, OMPC_linear, LangOpts.OpenMP);
+ if (CaptureRegion != OMPD_unknown && !CurContext->isDependentContext()) {
+ StepExpr = MakeFullExpr(StepExpr).get();
+ llvm::MapVector<const Expr *, DeclRefExpr *> Captures;
+ StepExpr = tryBuildCapture(*this, StepExpr, Captures).get();
+ for (const auto &Pair : Captures)
+ ExprCaptures.push_back(Pair.second->getDecl());
+ }
// Build var to save the step value.
VarDecl *SaveVar =
================
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp:1128
+ (A == OMPC_firstprivate && (Data.Attributes == OMPC_lastprivate ||
+ Data.Attributes == OMPC_linear)) ||
(A == OMPC_lastprivate && Data.Attributes == OMPC_firstprivate) ||
----------------
What is this change for?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D71475/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D71475
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list