[PATCH] D69760: [Clang][Driver] Don't pun -fuse-ld=lld as -fuse-ld=lld-link with msvc
John Ericson via Phabricator via cfe-commits
cfe-commits at lists.llvm.org
Fri Nov 8 10:08:14 PST 2019
Ericson2314 added a comment.
While I am fine making `-fuse-ld=lld` mean "use that lld driver most appropriate for the clang driver", in principle the clang driver and lld driver choices are orthogonal, and I'd want to expose that with something like `-fuse-ld=ld.lld` to compliment `-fuse-ld=lld-link`. How does that sound? Should we support `-fuse-ld=ld.bfd` and `-fuse-ld=ld64.lld` too?
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69760/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D69760
More information about the cfe-commits
mailing list